On January 24, 2006, CBS corporation and Time Warner announced they were merging UPN and the WB networks to create a new, larger TV network, "The CW." This merger means that the media companies that control local broadcast stations will have a larger audience if they are selected to be affiliates for the new CW network.
The company we are concerned about is Sinclair Broadcast Group. Sinclair is the company that pre-empted Nightline's episode that read the names of those killed in Iraq, that planned an hour-long propaganda attack on John Kerry two weeks before the 2004 election, and that continues to air right-wing commentary with no ideological balance.
The CW could mean two things for Sinclair: (1) its UPN and WB affiliates could be picked up by the new network, giving Sinclair even more power to distort the news; or (2) the new CW network could realize that doing business with Sinclair is bad for business.
Help us convince The CW network to not sign affliliate agreements with Sinclair. Take action now by sending a message to the CW network management below.
|
By using this online emailing tool, your message will go to the CW, CBS Corporation, and TimeWarner. Your email will also be added to our email list. You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our Privacy Policy.
What is Sinclair Broadcast Group?
Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., is one of the largest television broadcasters in the country. By its own count, Sinclair owns, operates, or services 62 local television stations in 39 markets - reaching 24% of television households in the United States.
Source: Sinclair Broadcast Group, www.sbgi.net.
How might Sinclair benefit or be hurt by the new CW network?
Sinclair owns or controls 18 WB affiliates and 6 UPN affiliates. If most of these Sinclair affiliates are picked up by The CW network, then Sinclair will benefit and the viewing public will suffer. If instead The CW pick the non-Sinclair option in these markets, then fewer people will be exposed to the unbalanced ideological tirades that Sinclair Broadcasting calls news.
Here are the current Sinclair WB and UPN affiliates:
|
WB-38 Tampa WB-23 Minneapolis WB-22 Pittsburgh WB-54 Baltimore WB-22 Raleigh WB-58 Nashville WB-18 Milwaukee WB-40 Asheville / Spartenburg |
WB-35 San Antonio WB-21 Birmingham WB-33 Norfolk WB-34 Oklahoma City WB-21 Las Vegas WB-49 Buffalo WB-43 Syracuse WB-49 Paducah |
UPN-28 Raleigh UPN-30 Nashville UPN-24 Milwaukee UPN-68 Birmingham UPN-48 Greensboro UPN-36 Charleston |
What is Sinclair's History of Biased News Coverage?
In April 2004, Sinclair ordered seven of its stations not to air Ted Koppel's Nightline broadcast featuring a roll call of the 700 U.S. troops who had died in Iraq. Republican Sen. John McCain, who was a prisoner of war in Vietnam, was among the many who criticized Sinclair's action. In October 2004, Sinclair planned to air "Stolen Honor" an hour-long attack film about John Kerry. Only a concerted effort by the public Stopped Sinclair then. Sinclair also regularly airs right-wing commentary on its local news without and moderate or progressive counterbalance.
Sources: PBS, 10/12/04, "Sinclair Under Fire for Decision to Air Anti-Kerry Film"; Media Matters for America's description of Sinclair's The Point.
Why else might we think Sinclair is biased?
In the 2004 political cycle, executives from Sinclair gave $78,540 in political contributions: 95% of that went to Republicans. We just report, you decide.
Source: The Center for Responsive Politics, www.opensecrets.org
StopSinclair.org is a campaign of StartChange, an advocacy group that works ensure that our companies play fair, our press is truly free, and our politicians work genuinely in the public interest. To learn more about us, visit: www.StartChange.org.
In October of 2004, our StopSinclair.org campaign was a successful effort to prevent the Sinclair Broadcast Group from running an hour-long attack on John Kerry on TV stations across the country. During the 2004 StopSinclair campaign, 152,407 people signed the online petition, 3595 people pitched in money to pay for targeted print and TV ads in Ohio and Nevada, and hundreds more came to rallies. Together, we Stopped Sinclair. To visit the website from the 2004 StopSinclair campaign, click here.
Questions about StopSinclair?Use the following resources to learn more about Sinclair and its history of biased news coverage.
SinclairAction
FreePress' Report: Sinclair and the Public Airwaves: A History of Abuse (PDF)